2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 240 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 556 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |