2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Triumph TR8
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Triumph TR8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Triumph TR8 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP) has 245 more horse power than 1979 Triumph TR8. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1979 Triumph TR8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 665 kg more than 1979 Triumph TR8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1979 Triumph TR8 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | TR8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 155 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 71.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2170 mm |