2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Skoda L
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 1980 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1980 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 667 kg more than 1980 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 456 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1980 Skoda L | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Mustang | L |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |