2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP) has 284 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 485 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Mustang | Murena |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 116 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
