2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1985 Renault 25
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 25 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1985 Renault 25. (63 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 300 kg more than 1985 Renault 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 25. (129 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1985 Renault 25 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 25 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 556 Nm | 129 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 21.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |