2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 618 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Mustang | Corniche |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 6749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3030 mm |