2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1986 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 342 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1986 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Mustang | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2260 mm |
