2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 388 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2003 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1910 mm |