2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Lada Niva

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lada Niva would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 1991 Lada Niva. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 328 kg more than 1991 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1991 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lada Niva. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lada Niva. 2003 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1991 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 1991 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Mustang 1991 Lada Niva
Make Ford Lada
Model Mustang Niva
Year Released 2003 1991
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 1452 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 400 HP 76 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 82.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 71 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1478 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 4630 mm 3730 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2210 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 43 L