2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1994 Volvo 960

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1994 Volvo 960. (168 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1994 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Volvo 960 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volvo 960. (233 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volvo 960.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Mustang 1994 Volvo 960
Make Ford Volvo
Model Mustang 960
Year Released 2003 1994
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4599 cc 2473 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 400 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 556 Nm 233 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4550 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2780 mm