2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Ford Tracer

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP) has 333 more horse power than 1995 Ford Tracer. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 513 kg more than 1995 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Tracer. 2003 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1995 Ford Tracer has manual transmission. 1995 Ford Tracer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: