2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Nissan 100 NX
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan 100 NX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan 100 NX would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. (141 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 343 kg more than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. (182 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Nissan 100 NX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1995 Nissan 100 NX | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | 100 NX |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |