2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 358 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Challenger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |