2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2790 mm |