2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 443 more horse power than 2003 Ford Mustang. (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 412 kg more than 2001 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Mustang. (530 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 2001 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Lotec |
Model | Mustang | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1150 mm |