2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 173 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | MM |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 372 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 106 L |