2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 662 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Mustang | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |