2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Lincoln LS

To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2003 Ford Mustang. (188 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 277 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 298 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Mustang 2005 Lincoln LS
Make Ford Lincoln
Model Mustang LS
Year Released 2003 2005
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3801 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 188 HP 232 HP
Torque 298 Nm 298 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1410 kg 1687 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4940 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 68 L