2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 77 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Mustang | 9000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2288 cc |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |