2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Mustang | I-350 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 3458 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |
