2003 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP) has 239 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (360 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Mustang 2010 Holden Colorado
Make Ford Holden
Model Mustang Colorado
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4599 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 400 HP 161 HP
Torque 556 Nm 360 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors