2003 Ford Puma vs. 1950 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Puma (99 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1950 Ford Taunus. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1950 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Puma weights approximately 208 kg more than 1950 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Puma | 1950 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Puma | Taunus |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 34 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2390 mm |