2003 Ford Puma vs. 1964 Lancia Flavia

To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 112 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Lancia Flavia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lancia Flavia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Puma 1964 Lancia Flavia
Make Ford Lancia
Model Puma Flavia
Year Released 2003 1964
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 1798 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 99 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 5800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1038 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 48 L