2003 Ford Puma vs. 1965 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 112 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Puma | 1965 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Puma | Flavia |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 56 L |