2003 Ford Puma vs. 1972 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda RX-4 weights approximately 72 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Puma | 1972 Mazda RX-4 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Puma | RX-4 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |
