2003 Ford Puma vs. 1981 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Puma weights approximately 298 kg more than 1981 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Puma | 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Puma | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1940 mm |