2003 Ford Puma vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 11 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1982 Renault 11. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Puma weights approximately 183 kg more than 1982 Renault 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Puma | 1982 Renault 11 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Puma | 11 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2490 mm |
