2003 Ford Puma vs. 1985 Nissan AZ-1
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan AZ-1 would be higher. At 2,950 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 (195 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma.
Because 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 (277 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 1985 Nissan AZ-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Puma | 1985 Nissan AZ-1 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Puma | AZ-1 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 277 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |