2003 Ford Puma vs. 1986 Honda Integra
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Honda Integra (113 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Puma | 1986 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Puma | Integra |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
