2003 Ford Puma vs. 2001 Nissan Alpha

To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Alpha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Alpha would be higher. At 4,490 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Alpha is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Alpha (301 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Alpha should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Alpha weights approximately 247 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Nissan Alpha is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Alpha will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Alpha (359 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Alpha will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma. 2001 Nissan Alpha has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan Alpha will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: