2003 Ford Puma vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Puma would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 742 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Puma | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Puma | Tundra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |