2003 Ford Puma vs. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy

To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 966 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (126 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Puma 2004 Volkswagen Caddy
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Puma Caddy
Year Released 2003 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 99 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1038 kg 2004 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2590 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 60 L