2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 388 kg more than 2003 Ford Ranger.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ranger | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3070 mm |
