2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Trabant Universal
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1964 Trabant Universal.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Trabant Universal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ranger | 1964 Trabant Universal | |
Make | Ford | Trabant |
Model | Ranger | Universal |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2030 mm |