2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 60 kg more than 1967 Pontiac Firebird.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Ranger | Firebird |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2750 mm |
