2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 865 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Ranger | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2010 mm |
