2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 736 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Ranger | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2430 mm |
