2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 690 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ranger | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Sigma |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |