2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 364 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 1982 Mercedes-Benz T | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Ranger | T |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2800 mm |
