2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 715 kg more than 1992 Renault 19.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Renault 19. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ranger | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | 19 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 78 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2630 mm |