2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ranger | 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Pajero |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2430 mm |