2003 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 454 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52.
1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |
