2003 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 605 kg more than 2003 Ford Ranger.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ranger | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Econoline |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 198 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3510 mm |