2003 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 220 kg more than 2004 Holden UTE.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 2004 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | UTE |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2950 mm |
