2003 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 611 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ranger | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Ranger | Polo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1109 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2470 mm |