2003 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 199 kg more than 2010 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ranger | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Rogue |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1521 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2690 mm |
