2003 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Peugeot 3008 has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot 3008 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ranger | 2012 Peugeot 3008 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 3008 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1837 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1639 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2613 mm |