2003 Ford Taurus vs. 1962 Vauxhall Velox
To start off, 2003 Ford Taurus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Vauxhall Velox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Vauxhall Velox would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1962 Vauxhall Velox. (95 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1962 Vauxhall Velox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Taurus weights approximately 397 kg more than 1962 Vauxhall Velox. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Vauxhall Velox is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Vauxhall Velox. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Vauxhall Velox. (200 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Vauxhall Velox. 2003 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1962 Vauxhall Velox has manual transmission. 1962 Vauxhall Velox will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Taurus | 1962 Vauxhall Velox | |
Make | Ford | Vauxhall |
Model | Taurus | Velox |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2651 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 48 L |