2003 Ford Taurus vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Ford Taurus is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Taurus weights approximately 315 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (207 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Taurus | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Taurus | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |