2003 Ford Taurus vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01

To start off, 2003 Ford Taurus is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2003 Ford Taurus. (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Taurus weights approximately 377 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.

Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01. 2003 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Taurus 1995 Mazda RX-01
Make Ford Mazda
Model Taurus RX-01
Year Released 2003 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2967 cc 2614 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 155 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 8500 RPM
Torque 244 Nm 216 Nm
Torque RPM 3950 RPM 6000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1477 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1250 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 65 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]